Who could
have imagined that American Muslims would produce their own Bonnie and Clyde?
Bonnie
Parker and Clyde Barrow robbed banks and killed 13 people between 1932 and 1934,
during the height of the Great Depression, in Central United States before
dying in a hail of bullets by police in Louisiana.
Now we have
Tashfeen and Rizwan, assailants at a potluck party at a county health
department in San Bernardino, killing 14 people in the span of a few minutes
before dying few hours later in a shootout with the police in a quiet
residential street nearby.
Tafsheen
Malik, 29, born in Pakistan but raised in Saudi Arabia, came to the United
States on a fiancé visa in 2014, the wife of Chicago-born Syed Rizwan Farook,
28, of Pakistani parents. Their victims ranged in age from 26 to 60. It was the
deadliest mass-shooting in the U.S. since the Sandy Hook Elementary School
massacre in 2012.
Unlike
Bonnie and Clyde who early showed psychopathic signs, there is as yet no
consistent explanation for the depravity, the utter inhumanity that motivated a
reclusive Muslim couple to consign their 6-month-old daughter to orphanhood-
even an animal would not abandon its baby with such callous cruelty as this
couple did - and murder 14 innocent people enjoying a quintessential American
holiday tradition. (It is not unreasonable to suggest that this monster became a
mother only to conceal her terrorist identity.)
All we know
is that the trajectory of their seemingly normal life hit a shocking
singularity on December 2, raising a million questions and unleashing a tidal wave
of rage and sorrow.
While
details are emerging daily about the couple, Malik pledged fealty to ISIS on
the day of the attack, for instance, the central fact is clear: Malik and
Farook planned the terror attack centered on their own malevolent ideas, the
seeds of which may have been sown abroad, nurtured by social media and
facilitated by the absurdly easy access to guns in America. The last-minute
allegiance to ISIS was more likely a desperate attempt at notoriety by the wife
desperate to hitch her wagon to an infamous organization.
Beyond
that, who can comprehend what Faustian bargain this couple made and why.
So what
now?
The average
American is angry at, and suspicious of, his or her Muslim neighbor and co-worker. This does not include xenophobic bigots like Donald Trump and Ben
Carson and their followers, whose numbers naturally spiked following the
killing, as did the sale of guns and ammunitions.
No, I am
talking about Americans who are not bigots and who are not hostile toward
Muslims by instinct. But they are undoubtedly worried and rightly so. A Muslim
friend, who has a college-going son, told me that his neighbor, whom he has known
for years, asked him this troubling question a day after the San Bernardino
shooting: “Does your son own a gun?”
We Muslims
must have the self-assurance, the integrity and the honesty, to acknowledge
that these Americans are not suffering from Islamophobia. They cannot be
categorized as Islamophobes. They have raised an existential question and the
least we can do, we must do, is to address it truthfully and practically.
The first
step is to engage our neighbors and co-workers in frank discussions,
not just in the wake of a shooting, but on a regular basis, about our faith,
our rejection of violence, and our loyalty to America. Too many Americans are
beginning to think these aspects of our lives are mutually exclusive. We must
dispel this notion. Inviting Americans to visit local mosques can help but that
is too limiting. It is the open and personal interactions at the neighborhood
and the office levels that we urgently need, and not just in liberal coastal
cities but in America’s hinterland.
But talk
can go only so far. We need to become a more integral part of what makes
America, America. This can include opening small soup kitchens, Muslim doctors
holding weekly or monthly medical clinics, creating a shelter for abused women,
promoting the gift of reading, tutoring neighborhood kids, organizing community
evenings to look at stars and constellations, and so on. Many Muslims
communities are already engaged in these activities but the number needs to
increase.
The second
step is to be alert for signs of extremism in our midst. For an Imam of any
mosque to say that “I saw no signs of extremism in this or that Muslim” is
becoming increasingly indefensible. If a seemingly moderate Muslim suddenly
stops coming to a mosque, the Imam and one or more congregants need to become
proactive and try to determine what may be brewing. It could very well be that
this particular Muslim had become fed up with mosque politics and decided to
pray at home. But it could be something sinister as well. If a Muslim suddenly
starts sprouting strident piety, that should raise a red flag. If someone
begins to show an inordinate fondness for guns, that too should ring an alarm
bell.
The point
is, almost always, there are signs. We just have to become more vigilant.
Consider the statistics. Published reports indicate that there are currently
900 American Muslims under investigation by the FBI for possible ties to ISIS.
Given that there are about 3 million Muslims in America, it translates to 3
Muslims per 10,000. Let’s say two of these three Muslims are proven to have no
ties to terrorism. That leaves 1 out of 10,000, which is still 1 too many! A
single psychopath, or a couple for that matter, can create carnage in a community
in the blink of an eye, as we saw in San Bernardino.
Finally, we
need to increase the quality of engagement with the youth in our mosques. Many
Imams in America, particularly those born abroad, cannot speak meaningfully
with the youth. (For that matter, many have not even mastered English, even
though they have lived in the U.S. for decades.) Many youth are alienated by
the obscure and irrelevant discourses they are forced to sit through in mosques
and conferences. Inevitably, they turn to the Internet to figure out for
themselves what Islam means and how they can practice their faith. In such a
vacuum, these vulnerable, impressionable youth fall prey to the seductive,
‘purpose-driven’ language of social-media savvy terrorist organizations like
ISIS. The process of selecting an Imam for any mosque in America needs to
become more rigorous, and preference should be given to U.S.-born Imams who can
relate to young Muslims as a kind and friendly teacher, rather than as an
authoritarian figure.
No comments:
Post a Comment